|
A few are claiming that homosexuals are born in that condition
and can no more correct their situation than can "the Ethiopian
change his skin." This claim is misguided and wrong. The
Bible condemns sexual perversion.
For this cause God gave them up unto vile passions: for their
women changed the natural use into that which is against nature:
and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman,
burned in their lust one toward another, men with men working
unseemliness, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their
error which was due (Rom. 1:26-27).
It would be evil for God to condemn someone for doing what he
or she is unable to avoid. God is not evil!
It is possible for a person to develop a habit so ingrained that
it is unlikely ever to be broken. Yet, the person was not born
that way. He developed his condition and has only himself to blame.
A person can become so addicted to illegal narcotics that the
probability of ever getting free from the foul obsession is remote.
The treachery of wrong habits is a good reason never to start
on any course that is damaging or sinful. It just does not make
sense to deliberately put oneself in harm's way - especially if
the results have eternal effect. The New Testament says of "those
who were once enlightened" and "then fell away, it is
impossible to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify
to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame"
(Heb. 6:4, 6). Their sad condition is not God's fault but is the
result of their corrupt behavior. A homosexual may be so devoted
to his/her vice as to be past the point of no return, but the
blame belongs to the culprit and should not be placed on God.
"God is light and in him is no darkness at all."
Homosexuals do change. Queer behavior has to be learned. It is
not natural. Paul speaks of those who "changed the natural
use of the woman." Unnatural conduct must be developed. Sexual
perverts must decide to do abnormal things. Having learned to
practice debased sexuality, the person can unlearn it, if the
habit has not become overwhelming.
We often hear of "former" homosexuals. Some claim skills
in changing the sexual degenerate back to normal conduct. There
are associations dedicated to reversing homosexual behavior. Whoever
heard of a "former" black or a "former" hispanic
or "former", anglo? Homosexuality is not genetic but
is acquired. For this reason the person guilty of such gutterish
and disgusting conduct can be held fully responsible. The Bible
says homosexuals will be judged and condemned for their shameful
practice.
Paul says some were previously "effeminate" and "abusers
of themselves with men," but, he says, "ye were washed,
but ye were sanctified, but ye were justified in the name of the
Lord Jesus Christ, and in the Spirit of our God" (I Cor.
6:9,1 1). They changed! They were no longer effeminate and abusers
of themselves with men because such conduct is unworthy of God
and the addicts of such filth "shall not inherit the kingdom
of God" (I Cor. 6:10).
In a report entitled, Gender Identity Disorders and the Family,
published by Family Research Council and written by George
Reker, Ph.D., the case history of "Carl" is given. Carl
was referred for treatment at the age of 8 years, 8 months. Since
the age of four, Carl had pronounced feminine voice inflection
and feminine speech content. His conversations were dominated
by topics such as dresses, cosmetics, maternal roles, female impersonators,
delivering babies, and female underclothing. He had several recurring
exclamatory feminine-sounding remarks, such as "goodness
gracious" and "oh, dear me."
His feminine gestures were exaggerations of an effeminate, swishy
gait and arm movements. He preferred girls' toys, particularly
dolls, and he played house with his sister frequently. Carl was
ostracized by his male peers who labeled him "sissy"
and "queer." He referred to himself as "fag,"
and he preferred to be considered a girl.
Carl's feminine behavior was increasingly leading him to social
isolation, ridicule, and chronic unhappiness. His mother, who
had found his feminine gestures to be amusing before he was age
four, was alarmed when they persisted to the age of eight years.
She strongly wanted him to have help.
Carl's doctor determined his sexual status was normal with a normal
46XY male karyotype. His gender identity was that of a girl. He
had a cross-gender identity and called himself a "sissy"
and a "fag."
Carl's mother increased his masculine play with males of his age
and decreased his feminine gestures, feminine speech content,
and predominant play with his sister. He was encouraged to associate
with males who gave him a strong masculine model. After fifteen
months Carl exhibited no feminine behavior. His mother, school
teachers, and neighbors all agreed that he had changed in a comprehensive
way from feminine-appealing to masculine boy. Six years after
attempting to reform Carl into a normal boy, it was determined
he had no difficulty in gender identity.
This exercise has been repeated in a large number of cases, and
the outcome is similar to that of Carl. Dr. Reker wrote:
From the result of my research studies, it now appears that a
preventive treatment for transvestism, transsexualism, and some
form is of homosexuality had been isolated in these techniques
of early identification and early intervention in the childhood
years.
He also said,
It would now appear logical that homosexuality per se be re-examined
as a mental disorder.
Reker observed:
It is possible that our society has not yet fully reaped the full
consequences of widespread breakdown of family units caused by
divorce. Too often divorce of the parents results in a divorce
of the father from the children. If research on the effects of
divorce and separation on children can be better communicated
to the general population of our culture, perhaps the American
public will make greater efforts to achieve stable marriage and
family life and be motivated to solve marital problems rather
than considering divorce as the only alternative.
In general, the picture of the fathers of gender-disturbed children
is in sharp contrast to the image of the idealized father who
promotes masculinity in his sons through his psychological and
physical presence, his active involvement with his children and
with the family decision making, his leadership, his dominance,
and his nurturance (Meed and Reker, 1979).
Meed and Reker may or may not be right in all their conclusions
but do present some interesting information. It is certain that
Bible writers are correct, and they say:
Wives, be in subjection unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.
For the husband is the head of the wife, and Christ also is the
head of the church, being himself the saviour of the body (Eph.
5:22-23).
Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy pain and thy
conception; in pain thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire
shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee (Gen. 3:16).
But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ;
and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is
God (I Cor. 11:3).
And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but nurture
them in the chastening and admonition of the Lord (Eph. 6:4).
The family as God designed it is to be headed by a strong, dominant
father-figure who is honored by a wife who holds herself in an
attitude of respectful submission to her husband. The children
learn to hold their parents in high esteem, recognizing their
dad as the head of the house and obeying the law of their mother.
The sons have a good male figure to duplicate, and the daughters
imitate a home-loving mother. Bible-based families will go a long
way in curing the problem of homosexuality and many other present
day difficulties.
There is no sufficient and conclusive evidence that homosexuality
is the result of a genetic imbalance. There are numerous cases
of people who lived the life-style of a homosexual for several
years and then decided to change back to conventional behavior.
This ability to go from one sexual orientation to another is clear
and undeniable proof that homosexuality is not some monster thing
that leaves the victim without choice.
The United States Congress has pending legislation that would
offer homosexuals all the protection of the 1964 Civil Rights
Bill. Lift your voice in protest. Many schools are attempting
to brainwash our children. Be aware of what is happening in the
schools and work at keeping the slime out of the classroom.
The San Francisco Bay Area Network of Gay and Lesbian Educators
distributed through the National Education Association recommendations
for addressing the concerns of male and female homosexuals. Some
of the recommendations were as follows:
Encouragement of teacher utilization of gay and lesbian people,
or parents of gays and lesbians as speakers in classes as part
of their material on the diversity of sexual orientation.
Be supportive of the presence of openly lesbian, gay, and bisexual
staff at all levels.
Do not make any assumptions regarding the sexual orientation of
students, clients, parents, or colleagues. Use non-gender specific
language whenever possible (e.g. partner, lover, person).
Inclusion of information, discussion, and recognition of gay and
lesbian issues (heterosexism, homophobia, homosexuality) into
curriculum, lesson plans/syllabus, and course work in various
disciplines at various grade levels.
Include readings which address lesbian and gay issues on required
and recommended reading lists.
With your students, discover and plan ways to participate in local
and national gay pride month/week activities as a way to celebrate,
learn about, and better understand lesbian, gay, and bisexual
culture.
Familiarize yourself with local gay and lesbian resources (social/political
organizations, health care agencies, counseling services, clubs,
youth groups, readings, and file materials) and use them in your
class.
Requirement of comprehensive human relations/sex education instruction
within the health curriculum framework which include information
of the diversity of sexual orientation.
Inclusion of age-appropriate, gay-sensitive literature in school
libraries and have them accessible to students.
On July 5-8, 1992, the National Education Association held its
annual convention and adopted dozens of radical left-wing resolutions.
These include:
- Getting all children into the public schools by the age of
three and making kindergarten compulsory for all children.
- Subjecting all public school students to psychiatric experimentation.
- Sexuality classes for all grades and the distribution of contraceptives
to minors without parental knowledge or consent.
- Opposition to home schooling, parental choice in education,
tuition tax credits, vouchers, and any parental supervision of
the schools.
- Taxpayer-funded abortion on demand throughout nine months
of pregnancy.
- Homosexuals teaching in the classroom even if they have AIDS,
and counseling of students by homosexuals.
- Allowing the homosexual caucus to distribute its propaganda
to the convention attendees.
It may be later than you think! Homosexuals are set to take over
the world and the National Education Association serves as the
go-between. Decent people must stand up and make themselves heard.
Someone has said, "Evil prevails when good men do nothing."
Daniel Defoe said of Moses, "A merciful, meek man, and yet
with what fury did he run through the camp, and cut the throats
of three-and-thirty thousand of his dear Israelites that were
fallen into idolatry." Of course, we cut no one's throat,
but we must stop some mouths and powerfully oppose all that is
contrary to what is just and right and pure. Fidelity to God demands
it! The Bible is the two-edged sword of God's word. We must take
that sword and cut in pieces all who promote things hostile to
God. It is the unchangeable word of God to which we must submit
ourselves, and is not something we can bend to suit our private
prejudice and preference. It is the only standard for morality.
If we lose that infallible guide through neglect and ignorance,
we have neither chart nor compass and, being without hope, we
are pitiable. God help us!
|