|
The doctrine of eternal punishment is under attack. Offered in
its place is the ancient theory of annihilation (the idea that
wicked souls will cease to exist after a period of punishment).
One argument for annihilation rests on a misunderstanding of the
word destroy in Matthew 10:28: "And fear not them
which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather
fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell."
Many have mistakenly claimed that "destroy" in this
verse means to terminate existence. By their reasoning the wicked
will be punished, but not forever.
An obvious problem with this view is that it makes Jesus contradict
himself Jesus warned of "everlasting fire" (Matt. 18:8;
25:41) where "their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched"
(Mark 9:44). The wicked will go into "everlasting punishment"
(Matt. 25:46). How can they be punished forever if they cease
to exist?
But does not the word destroy mean a termination of existence?
After all, if a building is destroyed, it no longer exists. The
problem here is common in Bible interpretation. We often apply
a word in a physical way when the Bible uses it in a spiritual
sense. Destroy in Matthew 10:28 does not refer to the destruction
of a material object. It is spiritual destruction which has nothing
to do with a termination of being. The word for destroy is
apollumi, which can refer to physical destruction, but which
often refers to spiritual ruin and misery. It is the word in Paul's
warning, "Destroy not him with thy meat, for whom Christ
died" (Rom.14: 15b). The prodigal "was dead, and is
alive again; he was lost (apollum), and is found"
(Luke 15:24). The wayward son was not destroyed physically; he
was ruined and wrecked spiritually. He was "dead" and
"lost" (destroyed), but he was no more physically destroyed
than he was physically dead. Similarly, when Jesus says that the
wicked will be destroyed, He means that they will suffer ruin
and misery-forever. The "everlasting destruction" of
sinners in 2 Thessalonians 1:9 is to be understood in the same
way.
A simple way to understand this sense of the word destroy is
to draw a parallel to the word create. This word can
refer to bringing into existence something that formerly did not
exist. For centuries this has been called creation ex nihilo - out
of nothing. But the word create can also refer to a change
in the state of something or someone that already exists. When
Paul says that we are "created in Christ Jesus" (Eph.2:10),
he does not mean that a being is brought into existence out of
nothing. He means that an already existing being has experienced
a change in state. To say that a person becomes a new "creature"
or creation (2 Cor. 5:17) at baptism does not mean the person
began to exist at this point. It simply means that his spiritual
condition has changed.
Likewise, the word destroy in Matthew 10:28 does not mean
the wicked will cease to exist; it means their state will change.
The spiritual creation of a Christian is not the creation of a
soul out of nothing; the spiritual destruction of a sinner is
not the destruction of the soul into nothing. The creation of
Ephesians 2:10 is a beginning of a state of existence, not the
beginning of existence itself The destruction of Matthew 10:28
is an end of a state of existence (one characterized by the opportunity
to commune with God), not the end of existence itself. This simple
analogy reveals the weakness of the annihilative approach to interpreting
the Bible.
The Bible offers no consolation to the lost. It does guarantee
a sentence of eternal punishment for those who die in sin. May
we never compromise this basic Bible doctrine in an already compromised
world.
|